You ain’t got no Picasso, yo?!

Icon

Just another Art kid tryna blog. //// Version: The Street Architect – Can you dig it? Yes ya can.

Paul Rand Inc

i found this pretty dope blog entry on my now new fav blog: amassblog.com

i’mma re-copy and paste it for your pleasure:

rand_card

i receive lots of emails asking about paul rand. it seems many people want to know what it was like to have him as a teacher, or how many rand-designed items i have. like so many of his students, i have my own personal stories to tell. after leaving yale, I kept in touch with him and tried to visit often. the videos you see on youtube—or the interview with steve jobs about working with him—give a pretty accurate picture of what he was like. my association with him has engendered many stories. here is one. i once had the pleasure of interviewing withpeter arnell. this was in 1993 when he was still working with donna karan and i was an art director at bergdorf’s. (you may not know, but when apple did the “think different” campaign and chose paul rand as one of the featured artists, it was peter arnell’s photo they used. i have always disliked that he made money from that.) anyway, i walked into arnell’s office and sat down. he did not open my portfolio. he held up my resume and read it aloud. “so, you went to yale?” he asked. “i did,” i replied. “it doesn’t bother you that i went to princeton and my partner went to columbia?” “no,” i said, “not everyone gets into yale.” (i already figured I wasn’t getting the job.) “so you studied with paul rand?” ”i did.” “would he remember you?” “um, i guess. i would like to hope so.” at this point he yelled out to his assistant, “can you get paul rand on the phone?” ok. there is a first time for everything. the only thing going through my mind was what mr. rand could possibly say. and what if he didn’t remember me? although i was pretty sure he would. arnell put the phone on speaker and we listened together as it rang over and over. arnell was watching me the whole time. i remember this as if it were yesterday. finally the answering machine came on. arnell hung up without leaving a message. i wasn’t especially relieved, mostly just perplexed. what would he have asked him? we then proceeded to discuss rand and his work. what i liked about it, etc. the rest of the interview was pretty uneventful. for my follow-up to the interview, i sent arnell one of my prize rand books, “leaved canceled,” a book he designed in 1945 for knopf. i included a note of thanks and mentioned our shared enthusiasm for mr. rand. my southern roots expected some sort of response. it never came. mr rand touched many people, even someone like peter arnell. mr. rand’s business card sits framed on my shelf, like so many other things he designed. enjoy.

fyi: for privacy reasons the phone number was left incomplete

Filed under: Art, Life, Thoughts, friendship, political, society , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How to Write an Artist statement, word?!

Forget art school. Smizzy has the answers….. No I actually, I don’t have ALL the answers – but I do know where to find the answers that I seek.  Well, answers are usually more like tips to help you find your own personal answer – but resembles some sort of answer never-the-less.

I realized a while back that the institution is against folks like me – poor, working class, female (i’m not black but they’re against that too) and we agree to disagree when things are going good.

As an artist we are asked to write artist statements. A few months ago a tutor of mine told my class to look up a few websites that were supposed to offer support in writing that ‘perfect’ artist statement. In reality, however, didn’t offer any advise i didn’t know already and kind of didn’t help but made the process worse!  There was one website which stuck out where the writer describes writing a statement close to cooking a stew.  Bizar. But, it stood out!

So here is what I learnt from many art critics, writers, lecturers, artists, ect and from my very own experiences.  This isn’t fully comprehensive but should help you begin to help you on your journey (and myself!) on to producing an artist statement which will make mediocracy flee in fear!

What do you think? – -

Oscar Wilde wrote “It is more difficult to talk or write about a thing than to do it.” “Criticism is a creation within creation.” “The highest criticism is more creative than creation.” “Creation limits, while contemplation widens the vision.”

With this in mind, lets move on to the “tips” and examples.

A New Type of Artist Statement: Write in plain language. Keep it short, simple, to the point. Use your own syntax; write the way you speak. With gigantic abstractions (“nature,” “beauty,” “ambiguity”) say what you’re actually doing with these big things. Don’t be afraid to be funny/weird or your stupid self! A glimpse of real self is powerful.

It’s not that big words or art historical language is inherently wrong, it’s that it’s usually unnecessary and sounds foreign coming out on paper for people who don’t speak that way. If you’re someone that drops those words in conversation , you might be able to make them work, but if you’re trying to fit them in then they will ALWAYS sound clumsy.

I’d like to add that nobody gives a shit if you’ve “always been creative from the time I was 5yrs old”. It has no bearing on an informed body of work and doesn’t tell me anything.

The artist’s statement should give the reader another reason to look at the work. Anything too general or fuzzy won’t give the reader something more to see, or a new way to think about what they’ve already noticed. Many people are more verbal than visual, so the artist might need to give the reader another reason to spend time looking. Straightforward doesn’t mean too simple or easy. . .

and please don’t use the word, ‘heteronormative.’

it is very important that an artists statement is at least informally edited by a friend, like minded gallery person, professional writer. etc. No good writing occurs without an editor (good thinking, as people here constantly display, but there is nothing to sap an artist of their potential power then a badly written statement).

he truth of french theory and frankfurt school and lacan and all the other theorists that have informed artists is that these writers were really really smart and in order to write along with them you’d better start sharpening your head. Reading is one thing, but writing about these ideas is something else. Usually one gets pretentious garbled imitations of really great thinkers. Just because i have read Middlemarch 10 times does not make me George Eliot. Like all ‘influences’ outside of the appropriation discourse, they are most eloquent when they are invisible. I don’t think that there is a single anti-intellectual on here. But people do have bullshit meters. Amateur theory writing is about as effective as amateur surgery.

Also, avoid using Lacan, Baudrillard, Derrida, Kant, and Foucault names in your artist statement!

A clear statement is another tool in the artist’s toolbox: it is an opportunity to describe their work, and secondarily, it presents an opportunity for the artist to articulate their artwork in writing.

My feeling is to bring back the manifesto- to express what your values are, and aren’t. Historically artists used to hang out in different camps and their manifestos were about how they would change the world which revealed what values they held and that seems like fertile ground for an artist statement.

Watch out for the word “I.”

DO NOT use phrases like “My work is intended” or “My work is about.” The word “practice” is the same as the word work. Use one or the other.

Watch out for gigantic abstract words “nature, ambiguity, beauty, reconciling opposites.”

best one is Carter Ratcliff’s: “I am a poet who writes about art.”

EVen bad artists SAY interesting things about their work; I have never HEARD a dumb artist.

Just write how you talk: Keep it simple and NO PLADITUDES about GIGANTIC ABSTRACT IDEAS, dummies.

f you are going to refrence other artists watch out for Giants (Twombly, Picasso, Duchamp). They make you sound smaller and pretentous. We are all referencing those types of artists (by accepting OR rejecting them). Don’t name them in your statement. Period. You may name names of artists that emerged AFTER 1990. That puts you much more at risk.

Remember that you live in the 21st century; not the early 19th century. You are NOT a Romantic Artists fighting to replace God or save art’s life or restore balance to a universe peopled by unknown Gods. The stakes have changed. (I know that we still live in a word similar to this but the terms HAVE changed; GROW UP; Get Your Own Ideas; otherwise you die A LITTLE; even if you have to rip ideas from the hands of the dead; GET AN IDEA).

I also say, Keep it short! Say it in 100 words OR LESS.

There is nothing wrong with humor or irony in an artist statement.

No matter what get a trusted friend to read your Artist Staement BEFORE you put it out. Tell them to rip it to shreads or tell you if it sounds silly or empty. If one person says “It’s perfect” they are lying or scared to tell you or don’t know. Get one more person to read it. Repeat this until someone tells you some part of it that stinks.

other artist staements BEFORE putting yours out. You will see that almsot EVERY Artist Staement SOUNDS the same. If yours sounds like these, it stinks and is boring.

It all boils down to DON’T BE BORING.

Joe Fyfe suggests this: (Get ready; it’s long; but it will be helpful):

- Leonard Cohen, “How to Speak Poetry”
- From Death of a Lady’s Man:

Take the word butterfly. To use this word it is not necessary to make the voice weigh less than an ounce or equip it with small dusty wings. It is not necessary to invent a sunny day or a field of daffodils. It is not necessary to be in love, or to be in love with butterflies. The word butterfly is not a real butterfly. There is the word and there is the butterfly. If you confuse these two items people have the right to laugh at you. Do not make so much of the word. Are you trying to suggest that you love butterflies more perfectly than anyone else, or really understand their nature? The word butterfly is merely data. It is not an opportunity for you to hover, soar, befriend flowers, symbolize beauty and frailty, or in any way impersonate a butterfly. Do not act out words. Never act out words. Never try to leave the floor when you talk about flying. Never close your eyes and jerk your head to one side when you talk about death. Do not fix your burning eyes on me when you speak about love. If you want to impress me when you speak about love put your hand in your pocket or under your dress and play with yourself. If ambition and the hunger for applause have driven you to speak about love you should learn how to do it without disgracing yourself or the material.

What is the expression which the age demands? The age demands no expression whatever. We have seen photographs of bereaved Asian mothers. We are not interested in the agony of your fumbled organs. There is nothing you can show on your face that can match the horror of this time. Do not even try. You will only hold yourself up to the scorn of those who have felt things deeply. We have seen newsreels of humans in the extremities of pain and dislocation. Everyone knows you are eating well and are even being paid to stand up there. You are playing to people who have experienced a catastrophe. This should make you very quiet. Speak the words, convey the data, step aside. Everyone knows you are in pain. You cannot tell the audience everything you know about love in every line of love you speak. Step aside and they will know what you know because you know it already. You have nothing to teach them. You are not more beautiful than they are. You are not wiser. Do not shout at them. Do not force a dry entry. That is bad sex. If you show the lines of your genitals, then deliver what you promise. And remember that people do not really want an acrobat in bed. What is our need? To be close to the natural man, to be close to the natural woman. Do not pretend that you are a beloved singer with a vast loyal audience which has followed the ups and downs of your life to this very moment. The bombs, flame-throwers, and all the shit have destroyed more than just the trees and villages. They have also destroyed the stage. Did you think that your profession would escape the general destruction? There is no more stage. There are no more footlights. You are among the people. Then be modest. Speak the words, convey the data, step aside. Be by yourself. Be in your own room. Do not put yourself on.

This is an interior landscape. It is inside. It is private. Respect the privacy of the material. These pieces were written in silence. The courage of the play is to speak them. The discipline of the play is not to violate them. Let the audience feel your love of privacy even though there is no privacy. Be good whores. The poem is not a slogan. It cannot advertise you. It cannot promote your reputation for sensitivity. You are not a stud. You are not a killer lady. All this junk about the gangsters of love. You are students of discipline. Do not act out the words. The words die when you act them out, they wither, and we are left with nothing but your ambition.

Speak the words with the exact precision with which you would check out a laundry list. Do not become emotional about the lace blouse. Do not get a hard-on when you say panties. Do not get all shivery just because of the towel. The sheets should not provoke a dreamy expression about the eyes. There is no need to weep into the handkerchief. The socks are not there to remind you of strange and distant voyages. It is just your laundry. It is just your clothes. Don’t peep through them. Just wear them.

The poem is nothing but information. It is the Constitution of the inner country. If you declaim it and blow it up with noble intentions then you are no better than the politicians whom you despise. You are just someone waving a flag and making the cheapest kind of appeal to a kind of emotional patriotism. Think of the words as science, not as art. They are a report. You are speaking before a meeting of the Explorers’ Club of the National Geographic Society. These people know all the risks of mountain climbing. They honour you by taking this for granted. If you rub their faces in it that is an insult to their hospitality. Tell them about the height of the mountain, the equipment you used, be specific about the surfaces and the time it took to scale it. Do not work the audience for gasps ans sighs. If you are worthy of gasps and sighs it will not be from your appreciation of the event but from theirs. It will be in the statistics and not the trembling of the voice or the cutting of the air with your hands. It will be in the data and the quiet organization of your presence.

Avoid the flourish. Do not be afraid to be weak. Do not be ashamed to be tired. You look good when you’re tired. You look like you could go on forever. Now come into my arms. You are the image of my beauty.

Like Leonard Cohen says:

“…Speak the words, convey the data, step aside. Everyone knows you are in pain. You cannot tell the audience everything you know about love in every line of love you speak. Step aside and they will know what you know because you know it already. You have nothing to teach them. You are not more beautiful than they are. You are not wiser. Do not shout at them. Do not force a dry entry. That is bad sex…”

“… be modest. Speak the words, convey the data, step aside. Be by yourself. Be in your own room. Do not put yourself on.”

It is just your laundry. It is just your clothes. Don’t peep through them. Just wear them.
If you declaim it and blow it up with noble intentions then you are no better than the politicians whom you despise. You are just someone waving a flag and making the cheapest kind of appeal to a kind of emotional patriotism.

Be specific ….

wE’Ve all read books, stop referencing them all!

From artist James Gurney:  (DON’T USE ANY OF THE BELOW STATEMENTS)

Add any 3 from columns 1 to 3 and, voila, instant artist’s statement…

“My recent work is:

Column 1
An exploration of the irreducible act of mark-making…
An investigation of the mimetic process…
An excavation of the inheritance of the past…
A disquisition on our shared narratives…

Column 2
…which seeks to unravel the threads of visual discourse
…which delves into the connectedness of the real and the abstract
…which re-encodes ambiguity and authenticity
…which reveals the undercurrents of ritual

Column 3
…by creating a conversation between color and texture.”
…by disjunctively animating it through a process of mimicry.”
…by mediating clichés through a retro-nostalgic lens.”
…by alluding to tropes of the built environment.”

Many thanks to Jerry Saltz, Matthew Weinstein, Oliver Wasow, 
michael corris, Wendy E. Cooper,
 Mark Staff Brandl, Lisa Beck, 
Dennis Kardon, and many more. 

Filed under: Art, Blogroll, Funny, Life, Quotes, Thoughts, advice, architecture, artworld, brooklyn, doncaster, exhibition, graffiti, lists, new york city, photography, poetry, political, revolution, sheffield, society, street art, travelling , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Fee or no Fee?

So, we know that my relationships with the institution – whether that be the University/academy, or the school, or the gallery/museum, or the family, ect – are rocky, and often precarious.

No matter what I do, I always seem to be screwed by them.

Take the place where I study.  I love SHU. I think it’s great. Contemporary Fine Art at SHU is one of the best courses you could ever go on. For a number of reasons. You are taught to be self-motivated, to develope a practice and not just simply a portfolio or a piece of work, you have time and the space (mentally) to develop into the artist that you want to be. The staff, of course, are just simply fantastic; and the community of students are the least competitive and the most supportive that I have ever seen in terms of an art course.

However, the pure beurocracy of the institution limits the greatness of what SHU could be. (An ironic statement since their  wanna be – business – savy talk, and plans, and wanna be materialistic and capitalistic endeavors actually hinders their positive attributes!)

As part of my course I had to undertake a work placement/internship/work experience for 12 weeks. This could be taken at any time between the summer/september and to be completed by the end of January 2010.  I asked the student finance how to fill out my loan request form for tuition fees in my last academic year. They said tick these boxes (placement) and this one for one semester (university). So my LEA decided that I only had to pay half of the tuition fees because I am in actuality not in college. I am in a different country, working for free, NOT in the university.

I enrolled (after many problems – of course – more beurocracy) and as I enrolled it said: You will may £3,700. Alarm bells started to ring. My LEA loan form told me they were only going to pay the semester that I was at college. surely this was a mistake on the behalf of SHU?  I rang some people in the university – They told me that they’d call me back… then never did.

I went to America, had an amazing time.

When I arrived in the USA. My editor tells me that my college had never tried to contact him before my arrival. This was embarrassing on my behalf. It looks unprofessional, and certainly makes me look foolish. I didn’t appericate this. It also told me that the university didn’t actually care about my personal welfare. I just took a plane to Chicago, and no one checked to see whether there really was an office, or whether one would be insured. An act of gross misconduct if they want to be professional and business like!

So, I grit my teeth and shake it off. What did I really expect from SHU?  I had contact with a member of staff 2 times via email and skype (the latter to make sure i was still alive i suspect).  after 4 awesome months, I arrive back home to a bill for £1,6315 of tuition fees for the 1st semester that I wasn’t there for?

Thanks SHU!

I go to college the next available working day and ask to clarify a few things.

Here’s my case:

  • I was in a different country
  • I never had any classes, lessons, no staff contact, no use of facilities, the institution couldn’t even be arsed to check on the place I was going.
  • the placement takes a semester up in time
  • the placement was unpaid
  • There was no exchange, thus no one was using those facilities instead of me?
  • they could, of course, argue that I was using the SHU name for my placement – but to validate that excuse I believe that they should have checked-in in Chicago.

Erm, so why do I have to pay tuition fees for that semester?   For January onward I have no problems with?  I thought I paid tuition for well… it’s the name TUTITION FEE?

Clearly we are laboring under some misapprehension?

I went to Student Finance, they were equally confused. The woman rings another woman up – she doesn’t use my name – she refers to my student number throughout the whole conversation.

There the cold, unearthly realization hits me hard. I always moan – yeah we’re just numbers. But there it was, in the thick of my fincial crisis. I am being refered to 106.

“1-0-6 says that they got it in the post”  the woman continues.   I am – ultimately – just a number! Another pay cheque, another profit. Another student through the system who will cough up 1 and half grand of cash with no university support to show for it?

She gets off the phone, ” it’s not a finance thing” she replies handing me back the BILL, ” See your faculty”

So I go to call the Faculty. It’s rare for someone to meet the administration staff , poor folks are always the first to get students like me bitchin’ at them for the university beurocracy and lack of communications between departments (i hope they get my fee in their wage package) – i feel like i am on Deal or no Deal. The woman is the banker.

She tells me to go to the Finance department, I tell her i’ve been there and they told me to call her. She is now also confused. She tells me she will enquire and call me back.

45 minutes later, i was the belief it was going to be another non-call back, there was my New York Shit by Busta-rhymes ring tone.

Before I answered i KNEW that the answer was that I was to pay the money because, well they wouldn’t have called me back otherwise.

They tell me MOST of the people she has asked say I should pay it because it’s a modual component thus, i have to pay for it. Hmmm I think, isn’t computer science, architecture, engineering all compulsory modual components?  yes. But this is art, and well – the institution definitely would like to make an extra buck.  She tells me I NEED to tell my LEA to pay the other tution fees.

How do I do this when they, like most people, think i shouldn’t have to pay it by their classifications. PlACEment in a different country does indeed equal no teaching?!

Should be a fun phone call.

This of course comes at a time where the government wants to make courses 2 years long, instead of 3, raise tuition fees and get rid of maintenance grants all at the detriment of education.  Of course, this will reflect in years to come with a badly educated workforce and a classist system whereby only the middle class rich kids can afford to go to university, and receive a 2 year mediocre course in what typically should take even 4-5 years of studying to truly get to know the subject matter personally and intelligently with integrity and passion.

my irony continues, as I have discovered by writing this that i actually can’t spell tutition ! Thanks spell checker!?

But in conclusion, what do I know? I’m just a working class kid that has somewhat beat the system thus far by the skin of my teeth, to be caught out on the worst area to caught out on for me – MONEY!

Stubborn in my ways, one will have to call the LEA but I am still very convinced that this should not be the case.

Yeah, Sarah Smizz is back with the blogging.

HOLLA!

Filed under: Art, Kezwilla, Life, Quotes, Thoughts, advice, architecture, doncaster, exhibition, films, lists, political, revolution, sheffield, society, street art, travelling , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Sheffield Landscape

Wait-whaaaaart?

more info coming soon. word.

Filed under: Life, Quotes, Thoughts, brooklyn, doncaster, exhibition, friendship, lists, new york city, photography, poetry, political, revolution, sheffield, society, streetform, travelling , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Getting back to the blog

So now my time in Chicago is drawing to an end, and i feel refreshed with new knowledge and meeting amazing people – I feel suppppeeeeerrrrrr mo’ productive (which is good because this is what I need to bring to my work in Sheffield).

With my new found productivity, Smizz is going to start to blog regularly again. I feel like i have missed the blogging.  So lets try  out a new look for a new year!

Blogging soon

watch this space!

much love

smizz!

Filed under: Art, Blogroll, Life, advice, architecture, artworld, exhibition , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A really cool magazine

http://www.purple.fr/journal.php?p=112

this is what real awesome design and magazines are like.

Number 1
English Version 
2010 – Yearly

298 pages
Cover color, inside black on grey paper

Cahier 01 Marcel Cohen, 10 texts
Cahier 02 Living in Japan
Cahier 03 France
Cahier 04 Thoughts
Cahier 05 Comunal Argea
Cahier 06 Lisboa
Cahier 07 Characters
Cahier 08 Winter Garments
Cahier 09 New York Now and Then
Cahier 10 Buenos Aires, Guillermo Ueno’s Favorite People
Cahier 11 Idols
Cahier 12 Adventures
Cahier 13 Szymon Zaleski, The Semitic Tragedy
Cahier 14 Rio de Janeiro
Cahier 15 Creatures

Judith Affolter, Leonor Antunes, Jean-Christophe Bailly, Arnold Barkus, Laetitia Benat, Amit Berlowitz, Guillaume Besnier, Dike Blair, Marcel Cohen, Sonia Collins, Geoffrey Cruickshank-Hagenbuckle, Gérard Duguet-Grasser, Pablo Durán, Anders Edström, Laura Erber, Óscar Faria, Mark Fishman, Elein Fleiss, Anne Frémy, Danièle Gibrat, Aki Goto, Pablo Guerra, Yannick Haenel, Nakako Hayashi, Michiko Hayashi, Takashi Homma, Kyotaro, Béatrice Leca, Yukari Miyagi, Valérie Mréjen, Raphaël Nadjari, Federico Nicolao, Paulo Nozolino, Gaelle Obiégly, Jeff Rian, Daniel Riera, Dieter Roelstraete, Tatiana Roque, Henry Roy, Stephen Sprott, Yuriika Suzuki, Sergio Taborda, Itaï Tamir, Guillermo Ueno, Antek Walzcak, Szymon Zaleski

Filed under: Art, Thoughts, exhibition, photography , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

new smizz work

finally, eh?!

Filed under: Art, Life, Quotes, architecture, artworld, brooklyn, doncaster, exhibition, friendship, new york city, photography, political, revolution, sheffield, society , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

New JAVASCRIPT animation

Yes, I’m starting to figure bits and pieces out as i go along. the clumby elements of this doesn’t bother me as yet. watch the sky turn different colours and try and scroll through the post utopia. you can defo tell that I have Chicago on the brain.  check it!

http://sarahsmizz.com/city1.html

and the first attempt now available on my website server. http://sarahsmizz.com/sky.html

Smizzo x

Filed under: Art, advice, architecture, artworld, brooklyn, exhibition, photography, political, revolution, sheffield , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Art Of England Magazine

Avilable from all good bookstores such as WH Smith, borders, ect.

Art of England , Sept 09 edition.

Here are some bad quality images (as i don’t own a scanner!) of the interview that Nathaniel Pitt ( of Pitts Studio Gallery in Worcester)did  with me about Project Biennale (www.projectbiennale.tk)  and the peripheral as, well i guess us working class folk / interventionist artists are always on the periphery.   Check it!

celebrating venice… indeed!

\

Filed under: Art, Life, Quotes, advice, architecture, political, revolution, sheffield, society , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Double Agent (first Draft – NOT Referenced properly yet!!!)

The Double Agent –   FIRST DRAFT, NOTTTT REFERENCED PROPERLY

How artistic collectivism and interventionist collaborative practices can be a confident move from Aesthetic autonomy to engagement with the social, the work place and the community.

Despite the [above] reservations a community still seems the only means by which we can overcome the extreme isolation of our vacant subjectivity, and begin to deal with the larger world. Such form the basis for the de-structuring of the present artworld; its institutions and authorities.”

Karl Beveridge, 1975 Art & Language

Recession continues to loom above our heads, the house prices are crashing faster than Air France planes,  whilst the Exchange rate on the Euro is just about equal to the Sterling Pound and people across the Western world are loosing jobs. All the while, London Olympics 2012 is tragically economically raping the Arts Council funding, which typically would help the small artist organizations within the UK.  Things look bleak, but surprisingly, it’s not as bleak as a family holiday to Margate on a rainy day.

This paper may come across like I have over romanticized the idea of collectivity and the autonomy of the individual. Perhaps I have? But if art history, and inevitably life experience, has taught us anything it is that to get through depressions, recessions, and oppressive situations that there is power in numbers. Collectivity.

We can see that over the past 30 years or so, socially engaged artists have made ‘work’ that is, distributed into the public sphere using various mediums including, more recently, the internet (Yes Men, The Thing, etc). Although it usually holds no dominate place within collections and museums, it’s important work as it radicalizes the individual from precarious artworld viewing traditions such as the White Cube space and allows an unknown recipient to carry out the act of the street (or other space) intervention without necessarily recognizing its place within the field of art.

The list of artist collective groups is endless but for referencing points we can look to artists who have a heavy history linked to interventionist practice within art: Art&Language (NY); Artists Meeting For Cultural Change; PAD/D (Political Art Documentation/Distribution); Fluxus; Red Herring; Group Material; ABC NoRio; REPOhistory; Temporary Services; Anarchitecture; Yes Men; The Thing, etc.  They all have the same thing in common; A belief that through a collectivity, a collective unity, art as a communicative activity has the potential of disclosing hidden structures and power relations and repression within systems that rule our society (artworld and non art world).

Interventionist art is varied and wide, even though, many still consider it to be ‘outsider art’. This would be a mistake to believe this critical brush over.  There are many dominant key figures who have been individually, or more usually, collectively engaged in a practice that sometimes operates within an interventionist’s field – often for more political / social engagement, which that of the gallery can not offer.  Theorist Stephen Wright describes the interventionist as an ontological secret agent who is forced to don multiple identities: artist/activist, theorist/practitioner, participant/viewer, organizer/organized.[1] No doubt the interventionist curator will find such ontological fabrication indispensable, such as the street or publications apposed to the institution.

We know that the autonomy of art is a debate all on its own that deserves a separate paper on such a topic. The grounding for the ideas behind the autonomy of art can be found in Kant’s propositions about art’s ‘purity,’ and its total disengagement from practical concerns, such as commercial, ethical or religious.  At the level of production, Aestheticism, l’art pour l’art, most fully embodied this vision of art’s autonomy. And at the level of the consumption of art, the autonomy of art suited the evoloving structures of bourgeois society. While art’s status of autonomy keeps it ‘pure,’ it also effectively prevents art from influencing the way people live their lives, and indeed, the way they might change their lives – and society – for the better.

However, ultimately as Joseph Bueys said, “ Everyone is an artist.” This creating of meaning in the intersection of our individual being and the rest of the world is not limited to specialists like “artists”. It is part of the human condition, an existential need and challenge we all deal with continually in one way or another. Together we created a shared world. Art, it could be argued, is the result of a successful coming together, through a back and forth process of dialogue, between oneself and the surrounding world. The success of autonomy is experienced as meaning, and it depends on the ability to explore and create existing and new connections. Instead of the individual opposed to the collective or the artist deciding to work with the “community,” my contention is that “collectivity” in one form or another is virtually an ontological condition of modern life, thus autonomous.

This then, is a catch 22, art could be a pseudo-autonomous discipline limited by its own ideology, stuck in its own Kant paradigm.  Art history and theory define or imply a field of interest. Anything that happens outside this realm is not considered relevant. Art establishment intellectuals are quick to realize aesthetic potential, but everything within their scope reaffirms what they already know. The establishment academician recognizes art for its relevance to a historically developed view. She sets new art and new meaning in an academic context that justifies continued faith in the truisms of the prevailing institutions.

Unfortunately, the facts are that we are living in a leading global operating business world, where profit over takes the needs of the individual. This is becoming problematic in matters linked to the social and economic environments of which we surround ourselves with.  Living in such a crude marketing and privatizing culture leaves little room for true education, free healthcare and other necessities for living, where the institution leads!

For example, we can think of the issues surrounding the ideas of gentrification and regeneration. Gentrification is a young word that refers to the transformation of neighbourhoods from low value to high value. This change has the potential to cause displacement of long-time residents and businesses. Gentrification is a housing, economic, and health issue that affects a community’s history and culture and reduces social capital. Ultimately it is an aggressive process of the displacement of the poor working class residents and culture at the detriment to city culture. But this, folks, is just neo-liberal capitalism.

Ranciere’s text on the Politics of Aesthetics is a key text for any artist working today whereby he differentiates the different regimes of art, trying to link the worker with philosophy and the history with the process of theories of the art world.  These ‘regimes’ of course are Ranciere’s versions of Modernism.  His cleverness persists as he links history with the history of labour.   This is where it gets interesting. Ranciere believes that art is granted its own sphere with its own rules, and is somewhat superior to those of common craft. Politically, this second way of thinking about art objects corresponds to the bourgeoisification of the artist, her transformation into a figure with her own freedom and independence, elevated above the demands of common labor.

“The absolute singularity of art and, at the same time, destroy[ing] any pragmatic criterion for isolating this singularity. It simultaneously establishes the autonomy of art and the identity of its forms with the forms that life uses to shape itself.” (p.23)

Interestingly, Gregory Sholette (co-founder of PAD/D) asked in his article for Documenta 12 Whether it is too much to expect to ask why it is relatively easy to visualize political dissent by artists and art institutions, and so difficult to imagine radical social change in one’s workplace, neighborhood, or nation?[2] Indeed.

The group PAD/D (Political Art Documentation/Distribution) is a great example of this. The place, which they felt that they wanted to locate their political practice, was to the side of the institutional art world mixed with radical left politics.  A key project that they lead in the mid 80’s due to this rise in business culture, thus gentrification, was the NOT FOR SALE: A Project Against Displacement, which attempted to rebel against the gentrification and displacement of the Lower East Side community. A group of 40 something artists got together and diffused art and community meetings in order to stop the displacement, to let LES residents understand their tenancy rights and so forth.    They sorted to try and recreate an alternative, progressive art network resembling those of the 1930s.  Whilst this project was successful, the group died-out in 1989. However they inspired other groups such as ABC NO-RIO (which is still alive today) and The Real Estate Show by COLLAB all dedicated to stopping the negative effects of Gentrification.  This would be an autonomous and ontological drive, as it required dialogue to move it forward. Furthermore, activism is fascinatingly an action for its own sake, close to the sentiment “art for arts sake”. The second is antagonism, an oppositional stance and combative action directed against traditional aesthetics and social norms, which neatly sums up in two phrases the history of the avant-garde. Both of which are two key elements of collective art groups such as PAD/D.

As we head to our own existential crisis of the early 2000’s with recession and conservative governments, many groups/collaborative efforts have appeared proving that socio-political crisis’s are part of our environment, hence forth in the make up of our autonomy, and thus art.

Ironically, PAD/D’s work now has its very own collection at the MoMA, NY dedicated to social, and political activism art of the 70s and beyond.   In spite of this, here we see that Art’s supposed autonomy is a sham that defuses and absorbs revolutionary art forms before they can effect the status quo.  Greg Sholette also writes about this issue, referring it to the “dark matter of the art world”.

“… when mainstream cultural institutions try to incorporate transient forms of art, or devise terms like relational aesthetics to package it, the result typically comes off as so many frozen assets, so much art world real estate plopped down on the multi-billion dollar monopoly board … one eye scanning the next investment opportunity in Asia or Africa or Latin America.”

Much recent writing about artist group activities employs some of the most impractical academic theory and language, an approach that belies the cooperative tradition that many groups attempt to engage within their daily practice. There is a sensitivity that emerges for those that learn to work and enjoy working in a group; and rely upon group work. It’s an action that shows a down to earth homage to groups before that reveals itself through the very act of choosing to work with others.

The hyper-individualism, upon which so much of the art world relies, is part of a capitalistic strategy used to produce money, sex, power and  of course exclusivity with it’s middle class elitisms. Collectivity is autonomy that strives to be honest about the human costs created as a result of the production of art, and about the existence of underlying power structures within all of our relationships. To be in a team, a collective is a very special act. To be in a team that wants to better the world, to make a positive difference, to help others and not just as a career boosting object is a rare phenomenon and should be celebrated, and taught and re-lived and be an inspiration to not just artists but all people.

In time, the triumvirate of art, trophy collecting and capital elitism will succumb to its own exclusivity, and art will be liberated from its servitude to an exploitive ideology. Rather, as art critic Michael Corris said, “it is offered as a reminder that the conditions of freedom are always in need of reconstitution.”

What ever happens, I’m sure the double agent will be ready for it.


[1] Stephen Wright, unpublished paper presented at the Townhouse Gallery, Cairo Egypt, December 13, 2005.

[2] Sholette, Gregory.  Documenta 12 http://magazines.documenta.de/frontend/article.php?IdLanguage=1&NrArticle=643

Filed under: Art, Life, Quotes, Thoughts, advice, architecture, artworld, exhibition, films, new york city, photography, political, revolution, sheffield, society, street art , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Smizz in 140 or less

Top Blogs

What I waste my time readin':

a

Flickr Photos

IMG_3575

IMG_3397

P6121786

P9162171

DSCF2767

DSCF2691

DSCF2635

P1210612

P1170451

P1170434

More Photos